Jump to content

Ludwig

Members
  • Posts

    761
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    43

Everything posted by Ludwig

  1. Vonrd had the sharp eye and caught the 1918 reference. I remember as a kid reading about Anthony Fokker and there was a description of his inspection of the plane and the plates bolted on the propeller... he was disgusted... it was so crude and he made some comments about the rest of their airplane industry and was generally very snobbish about the whole thing. I think he was really mad at himself for not developing the idea first. <wak>
  2. I am sure that it reduced some performance, but that is the only one I have seen with a rotary in it. I know there are others out there, but that is the only one I have personally seen, talked with the guy flying it etc. The drag is so enormous on these things that increase in power helps, but it is such a small % compared to cleaner designs.
  3. Missed #7 and #10 It always made me laugh that they explained the history of Roland Garros each year at the French Open Tennis tournament (guess who the facility was named for?) I had the Corsair nickname as the "Whistling Death" and I had also seen "Angel of Okinawa" though I never knew anyone to actually refer to the plane by those names. It was typically "bent wing bird" or that #$%ing hydraulic nightmare sitting over there in the corner of the hangar. The guns cocked hydraulically, really? sheeesh..... and according to the old CV guy working on it, had 14 hyd sequence valves. Incredible. The only thing I remember about it was no deck under your seat. My keys fell out of my pocket and they went down into the wingbox. Brilliant.
  4. About 2 months ago I spent and afternoon with Roger Freeman the owner and pilot of this Dr.I at the Pioneer Flight Museum at the old Kingsbury Aerodrome just outside San Antonio TX (where I live) and climbed in and tried this one on for size. Spent a pleasant couple of hours talking to him about flying it or one similar (he has built 3 including the one in the USAF museum at Wright Patterson) and at the end of it I was pretty satisfied that I didn't need to. Basically have to buy it and if I got it back down properly (which is the trick) then I could sell it back to him. I don't blame him one bit. He said absolutely NO WIND is required before he will take it up. PERIOD. Crosswind landings are just a disaster and even if you have a large field and can approach from directly into the wind, the slightest deviation in wind direction (shift) is going to be a real problem. Once the tail goes down you are a passenger. Period. Taking off was not that bad because you didn't have it on the ground that long and your escape was to get it in the air. Once there, he said that the airplane will continue to try and "swap ends" because of the torque which in this case was from the 80 hp LeRhone engine. He said that he ended up putting bungies on the rudder bar to help keep it straight because if you were flying it somewhere and you relaxed, it would start trying to bring the tail around in a flat turn. I asked him about that flat turn and how the pilots during the war described doing that and he said HAH! good luck NOT making a flat turn... that is what the plane wants to do, and if you let it... it will reverse course in a flat turn no problem. I described some of the behavior I have seen in RoF and he was not familiar with the game but said a strong NO to any of the traits seen in the game. It just doesn't do that. He said that turning into the torque was just not what you wanted to do, it would fight you and the turn would be resisted but turning with the torque it would come around in a hurry and was easy to control. He said you could make 3-4 turns with the torque in the time and space it would take you to make one against it, there was just no reason to fight it, you could make a 270° degree turn faster than a 90° against it. He felt that the stagger of the wings was insufficient and showed me where they (Fokker) had made the plane better by removing the middle wing, but it didn't have the integral strength without it... and the plane would have probably flown better/faster if they had just made the middle wing more of a spar than a wing. He pointed out the more extreme stagger of the Sopwith Tripane and said they go it right by spacing them further apart and prevented the pressure conflict between the wings that the Fokker exhibited. The trick is making a coordinated turn and then he pointed out that the ailerons were only on the top wing and that as such they were above the roll center (a LOT) and so when you banked the plane the ailerons were trying to roll the plane about an axis somewhere around or above your head... NOT the centerline of the fuselage, which when I looked up at the top wing made perfect sense. My first question to him was "does this thing fly as goofy as everyone tells me and he said "oh hell yes, it is a one of a kind" and went on to add some frills and dressings about the flight characteristics. He flies it, he enjoys it... some... but it is a risk every time you take it up. The only real damage they have incurred was when one of the ax handles broke and the wingtip dug in and basically cartwheeled it around, but the damage was minor and the lesson was learned. I asked about the D.VII sitting in the hangar.....he said Nah, you can take that up right now and turn it inside out, it's a beautiful well mannered plane and no wonder that the Allies were scared of it, they had every right to be. I had about 4 years in the CAF in Harlingen, TX when it was the CONFEDERATE Airforce, and spent an astronomical amount of money playing with old airplanes and I thought I had pretty much learned my lesson on that, but I wanted to get a little closer to these machines just out of curiosity. The only one that really winds my clock is the D.Va which they are building and it is really something. Just a gorgeous plane, and would be a real hoot to fly one, but once you have.... it drops off really fast as I have no desire to own another airplane but they are really enjoyable to see, but you don't fly them around to airshows (thank goodness) and you just don't go fly one of these and relax because of all the things that are involved. We spent more time honestly talking about the old days flying freight and did you know this guy and that airplane than we did these machines but I guess it is akin to an itch you just need to scratch to remind you to stay away from the poison ivy.
  5. FM_Tooter_Turtle Flying Misfits Your preferred side with FM on Red team USA Central Time
  6. HI Klaiber, I am previously registered with/under another name and now with Flying Misfits. Please put me on the list for FiF.
  7. OK, I am supposed to be available for this, please add me to the list. Black Haze and the old name from last time is fine... BH_Vfw Ludwig Hey Klaiber.... your avatar mouse reminds me of "Ignatz" from "Krazy Kat" caroons back in the 1960's.... any connection? Thanks LL
×
×
  • Create New...